Start Building for Free
CircleCI.comAcademyBlogCommunitySupport

Container runner performance benchmarks

1 month ago4 min read
Cloud
Server v4.3+
On This Page

Runner benchmarks show the performance tradeoffs of CircleCI self-hosted runners up to a non-acceptable error threshold. From the chart below, you can see there is a trade off between the following:

  • ReplicaSet

  • Concurrency

  • Tasks

  • Queue

  • Run time

Depending on your team’s workload types, for example, high parallelism, fan-in/out etc. you may need to adjust your cluster for high concurrency and tasks, potentially impacting queuing, run time, and other factors.

By publishing our benchmarks we can make measurable improvements to the performance and scale of CircleCI self-hosted runner, and show the impact of those improvements.

Total TasksMax ConcurrencyReplica CountNode CountFailure RateAvg Run timeAvg Queue TimeMax Queue TimeMax Run Time

128

80

3

5

0.000000

3855

76667

103048

11022

80

80

3

5

0.012500

3951

45000

60557

8556

40

80

3

5

0.000000

2386

24865

32445

10187

20

80

3

5

0.000000

1939

18014

23248

3095

128

40

3

5

0.007812

5089

90771

117578

19652

80

40

3

5

0.000000

2886

56460

69849

7609

40

40

3

5

0.000000

2146

26668

35319

3508

20

40

3

5

0.000000

2038

19586

24868

3014

128

20

3

5

0.000000

6413

70101

109269

31100

80

20

3

5

0.000000

3078

51401

72506

6939

40

20

3

5

0.000000

2127

31081

36791

3623

20

20

3

5

0.000000

2205

16902

19836

3304

128

80

2

5

0.007812

2848

78955

111321

5731

80

80

2

5

0.000000

2246

56652

87118

5992

20

80

2

5

0.000000

1721

17674

23279

2259

40

80

2

5

0.000000

2135

29990

36930

3248

128

40

2

5

0.007812

2532

72492

108279

6756

80

40

2

5

0.000000

3620

56225

75590

9391

40

40

2

5

0.000000

2048

24523

33774

3154

20

40

2

5

0.000000

1927

15072

18269

2732

128

20

2

5

0.000000

2325

62237

107474

5076

80

20

2

5

0.000000

2553

42657

67140

5982

40

20

2

5

0.000000

2235

28932

36972

3601

20

20

2

5

0.000000

1957

16123

22835

2974

128

80

1

5

0.000000

2105

113833

190044

5106

80

80

1

5

0.000000

2497

82633

135382

6952

40

80

1

5

0.000000

2092

37600

65750

3630

20

80

1

5

0.000000

1842

19383

24808

3004

128

40

1

5

0.000000

2049

109442

207049

5524

80

40

1

5

0.000000

1932

73936

135250

3757

40

40

1

5

0.000000

1937

40138

51027

3343

20

40

1

5

0.000000

1802

17303

22432

2592

128

20

1

5

0.000000

1809

107782

207405

3281

80

20

1

5

0.000000

1755

66260

126222

2863

40

20

1

5

0.000000

1786

35307

60009

2738

20

20

1

5

0.000000

2092

23581

30639

2662

Average

2499

48785

74731

5943

Minimum

1721

15072

18269

2259

Max

6413

113833

207405

31100

Runner configuration recommendations

Based on the reference architecture of GKE 1.29.4, using a node pool of 5 E2 medium nodes, and the above benchmarks, we can make several recommendations for container runner cluster configuration for the following:

  • Replica count of the container agent

  • Maximum concurrent task configuration

High performance cluster

  • 3 replicas of container agent

  • 80 concurrent tasks per replica.

This configuration makes a slight trade off in stability, a slightly higher rate of infrastructure failures, to achieve much higher task throughput and to reduce queueing times.

High stability cluster

  • 1 replica of container agent

  • 20 concurrent tasks per replica

This configuration trades off throughput for higher stability, with minimal infrastructure failures. This is the default configuration for the container agent Helm chart.

When tuning a cluster for performance there are three main variables to consider: container agent replica count, maximum concurrent tasks per replica, and node pool configuration.

Container agent replica count

The more replicas of container agent, the faster tasks will get claimed, as each replica runs its own collection of claiming loops. This is beneficial if you have sudden large backlogs of tasks to run, as tasks will be able to be claimed more quickly, and have a pod spec submitted to the Kubernetes cluster for scheduling. It is worth considering that the more replicas used (and more tasks that are able to launch concurrently) the greater the strain on the K8s control plane, and the more prone you will be to task start failures. CircleCI container runners will attempt to reschedule a task up to three times before declaring an infrastructure failure.

Maximum concurrent tasks per replica

This number in particular is very sensitive to node types and counts. The more tasks that are attempted to launch in a short window, the higher the strain on the Kubernetes cluster’s control plane, as well as the individual Kubelets, which are responsible for the pods and containers on a specific node. As node power and count increase, the impact of concurrent tasks on a cluster decreases. The lower the number of maximum concurrent tasks, the greater the reliability of tasks successfully starting and not experiencing an infrastructure failure.

The likelihood of an infrastructure failure for a task decreases as node count and resources are increased, particularly CPU.

Node types and count

The recommendations already presented are based on the reference cluster configuration. As a node pool grows, or is set to an instance type with greater resources, task execution becomes more reliable. When sizing a cluster, you should add headspace beyond that expected for an individual task. The Kubelet and container driver share the same resources as the pods on the node, and the more resource starved they become the more prone to long queue times and infrastructure failures tasks become. The more distributed pods are able to be scheduled the less pressure and backlog are applied to the individual Kubelets and container engines, resulting in shorter queueing times.

Troubleshooting

Refer to the Troubleshoot Container Runner section of the Troubleshoot Self-hosted Runner guide if you encounter issues installing or using container runner.


Suggest an edit to this page

Make a contribution
Learn how to contribute